Weblog

Sunday, 03 August 2008

  • The Sacred Romance

    With a two week extended period home in Kentucky, I'm trying to make my way through a series of books by John Eldredge. The primary book is The Sacred Romance. In addition, I'm reading fiction by Joel Rosenberg - fiction that reads more like front page news with events in Israel, Iraq and Iran. Throughout this week, I hope to post some observations. It's been a while since I've posted here so we'll see how it goes.

    With the Eldredge books, I have rarely found books that fit perfectly with where my heart is - these books have. Overwhelmed with so much to do, so many roles to play and so many dreams and aspirations to lay aside, my heart has been screaming at me - you're missing the point. So I'm using the Eldredge books to pull my mind and heart back away from the noise and rediscover the wonder of this God-given daily adventure called living. I want to rediscover the great romance of God daily seeking to have time with us and desiring to show us all that life can be.

    With the Rosenberg books, I'm trying to open my eyes to the possibility that we re seeing Bible prophecy unfold in the days and months to come.

    Hopefully I'l post thoughts on both

Sunday, 08 July 2007

  • Closing Chapters

    So here I am sitting in the airport in Cincinnati waiting for my connecting flight to Harrisburg trying to make good use of the time. Trying to catch up with the office after of a week of trying to stay away, I find it so very difficult to care about anything that happened at the office this past week.  Critical corporate issues seem too frivolous. Management updates from my team seem bothersome.  Unquestionably, getting back into the corporate mindset will be a challenge tomorrow.  As I head back to PA, I am more excited about my research focus this next month than I am about any work issues.

    I have decided to focus on two individuals who spent many hours in the Senate debating each other.  First is John Crittenden, a Kentucky Governor,, senator and most importantly, the man who tried to avert the Civil War through compromise.  His friendship with Henry Clay and his antipathy for Abraham Lincoln make him a very interested person to write about.  The other person is Thaddeus Stevens. He was the author of the 13th and 14th amendments, was a zealous abolitionist and a champion for reason as the war started.  Both Crittenden and Stevens were key figures to defining America's heart and soul during this tempestuous period.

    I am please to be closing a chapter where work dominated my time.  I look forward to Phase 2 of 2007, with more family time and more research focus.  I like closing chapters and opening new ones 

Wednesday, 04 July 2007

  • Celebrating the 4th

    Another 4th of July finds the American public debating difficult issues, struggling with government initiatives, searching for corrections to policies that seem incongruous with our national identity, and hoping for peace.  Yet we are still a country that welcomes debate and opening shares our differences.  Here I believe is our true national distinctive - One nation, indivisible - even when the topics are contentious and the passions run high. I'm proud to be an American when I see sharp opinions on both sides as we all recognize our own fallability and seek guidance from the "other side"


    In today's Louisville Courier Jornal, the lead editorial said it all - a liberal paper that publish words of Cal Thomas, a conservative columnist.  Here is that editorial

    "It’s a long way from Washington, D.C., to Washington, Ind., where my father was born a century ago next January and where I am attending a Thomas family reunion. On the drive from Indianapolis, one passes towns that could fill a Norman Rockwell album. My favorite is named Freedom because, though the town has only a single flashing caution light, it dis­p lays many flags. If I don’t slow down, I will miss both.
      Driving past miles of corn­fields, listening to local radio stations that still play music, not syndicated political talk, and carry com­mercials for farm equipment and feed, I ponder what it means to be patriotic and to love America.
      Last week, senator and Dem­ocratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said that religion is not the exclusive property of conservative Christians. He is right. Neither is patriotism a trademark of the Republican Party.
      As with religion, some peo­ple on the right have used patri­otism, which should be a unify­ing theme, to divide Americans. My liberal friends love America as much as I do. They might dis­agree on some, or all, of my po­litical and religious beliefs, but that does not make them less in love with America, much less un-American.
      Many political and religious liberals have family members who have served or are serving their country in war and in peace. These have spilled their blood and given their lives to guarantee our freedom to dis­agree and to still live together.
      Here in this Washington, I am told stories of how our fami­ly
    stuck together, neighbor helping neighbor, during the Great Depression; of a grand­father who was out of work at the B & O Railroad for two years; of employees with more seniority than he who took a day off so he could work and earn some money; of one of his sons (my uncle) who had a pa­per route and would bring home eggs donated by sub­scribers.
      Few here judged their neighbor’s worth based on his or her political or religious beliefs.
    They helped each other. This was the real America. When the “boys” went off to war, they had total support from family, friends, neighbors and all they left behind and for whose benefit they fought. When those who survived came home,some voted for Democrats and some for Republicans, but no one questioned their patriotism be­cause of their electoral or reli­gious choices.
      Last year, I visited Norman­dy, France for the first time. At the American cemetery, there is not an “R” (for Republican) or “D” (for Democrat) on the grave markers of those who died on D-Day.
     
    The 2008 presidential candi­dates and their supporters should be asked not to question the patriotism of their oppo­nents. Surely, most of us prefer debate and discussion of the issues that confront us to a litmus test about whose blood runs more red, white and blue.
      Leaders of many nations, in­cluding America, have used pa­triotism to persuade citizens of policies that are not always in their country’s best interests. Hitler’s deputy, Herman Goer­ing, cynically observed: “Natu­rally the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is under­stood. But after all, it is the lead­ers of the country who deter­mine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the peo­ple along, whether it is a de­mocracy, or a fascist dictator­ship, or a parliament, or a com­munist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and de­nounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
      And still we love America for opportunities that do not ex­ist in such proportion in any other nation. A person who crit­icizes a particular policy does not necessarily love his country less than one who supports that policy. G.K. Chesterton said, “ ‘My country, right or wrong’ is a thing no patriot would ever think of saying except in a des­perate case. It is like saying ‘My mother, drunk or sober.’ ” After 231 years, we still try to make wrong into right and cheer the right and the nation that makes change possible when we succeed. That’s patri­otism."

    That says it all to me

     

Monday, 02 July 2007

  • Partial Truth is No Truth at All

    I continue my focused research on American Indian policy - particularly policy established by in the colonial period and early American republic period with the tribes of the southeastern area.  For the past two weeks, I have been focusing on Spanish contacts and early English contacts in the Carolina and Georgia colonies.  The more I read, the more I feel deceived - deceived by the simplistic generalties taught in school books about "Indians" and about the early American settlers.  While recognizing that standard educational curriculums cannot address the level of detail I now am addressing, I would not expect clear and daramatic contradictions.  I would not expect to have to "unlearn" and address a totally different historical reality.  Yet that is what I address in every page I read.  The enslavement of Indians, the theft of Indian lands, the murder of women and children - all in the name of the church - in the name of claiming the new empire for God.  I find discoverers who are truly invaders, settlers who are in fact land thieves, and civilized europeans who are barbarians in their treatment of indigenous tribes.  I find the partial truths I was taught in school bear no resemblence to the truth at all - in fact are cruel indoctination that most will never learn to question. 

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]